Opinion 94 - 23
FIRE DISTRICTS -- Extension (of district located within two towns) TOWN LAW, §§170, 172-d: In the case of the extension of a fire
district located within two towns, if the proposed extension is
upon petition pursuant to Town Law, §170(1), the town board of
the town in which the extension is to be located may proceed on
its own, without action by the other town. If the proposed
extension is without petition and by board motion pursuant to
Town Law, §170(2), joint action by both town boards is necessary.
If the area of proposed extension is within an adjoining fire
protection district, the town board of the town within which the
extension is located may proceed on its own pursuant to Town Law,
§172-d unless the fire protection district is located within more
than one town.
Town Law, §§170 et seq. contain provisions relative to the establishment and extension of fire, fire alarm and fire protection districts. Town Law, §170(1) provides as follows:
Thus, section 170(1) authorizes the extension of a fire district upon written petition (see Town Law, §171 setting forth the petition requirements). In the case of a fire district located within more than one town, joint action by the town boards is necessary only if the "proposed ... extension" is situated within more than one town. Accordingly, if, pursuant to petition, such a fire district is to be extended only into territory within one town, joint town board action is not necessary, and the town board of the town within which the extension is situated may undertake to extend the district (10 Opns St Comp, 1954, p 420; 7 Opns St Comp, 1951, p 369). Subdivision two of section 170, provides a procedure pursuant to which fire districts may be extended on town board motion, without petition (see 12 Opns St Comp, 1956, p 280). Subdivision two provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
Under section 170(2), joint action is required by the town boards of all the towns in which the district, "as ... proposed to be extended", is situated. The language in Town Law, §170(2) requiring joint action by all towns in which the district "as ... proposed to be extended" is situated is different from the language in subdivision 1 of that section which requires joint action only if the "proposed extension" includes territory in more than one town. The district "as ... proposed to be extended" includes the area of both the existing district and the proposed extension. Accordingly, joint action by the town boards of all towns in which territory of the existing district and the proposed extension is situated is necessary to extend a fire district on board motion without petition pursuant to Town Law, §170(2). Finally, if a fire district is to be extended to add area within an adjoining fire protection district, the procedures in Town Law, §172-d may be utilized. Section 172-d provides that:
Under this section, joint town board action is necessary to extend the fire district only if the adjoining fire protection district is located in more than one town. If the fire protection district is located within one town, then the town board of that town may proceed under section 172-d, even if the fire district which is to be extended is located within more than one town (see 24 Opns St Comp, 1968, p 967). Accordingly, in the instant situation, if the proposed extension is upon petition pursuant to Town Law, §170(1), the town board of the town in which the extension is to be located may proceed on its own, without action by the other town. If the proposed extension is without petition and by board motion pursuant to Town Law, §170(2), joint action by both town boards is necessary. If the area of proposed extension is within an adjoining fire protection district, the town board of the town within which the extension is located may proceed on its own pursuant to Town Law, §172-d unless the fire protection district is located within more than one town. We note that in all cases, written consent of the board of fire commissioners is necessary (Town Law, §§170[1],[2]; Town Law, §172-d) and the extension is subject to the approval of the State Comptroller (Town Law, §173[2]). November 29, 1994
|