Press Releases

CONTACT:
Press Office
(518) 474-4015

 FOR RELEASE:

Immediately
February 25, 2005


Comptroller’s Report Shows Unrestricted Aid for Local Governments Failed To Keep Up With Inflation or Budget Growth

Unrestricted aid for local governments failed to keep pace with inflation and State budget growth, according to a report issued today by State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi.

Unrestricted aid, also known as revenue sharing, is distributed primarily to local governments to be used for any governmental purpose. From the time of its highest allocation in 1988-89, revenue sharing has declined by 26.5 percent, while inflation has increased by 65.5 percent and State revenues have increased by 93 percent. If revenue sharing had increased at the rate of State spending growth over the last 17 years, unrestricted state aid would be more than double its current level.

“Revenue sharing has declined significantly over the last two decades,” Hevesi said. “Local governments face tremendous challenges, and State leaders need to determine the best methods to meet local governments’ needs for State aid.”

The research brief analyzes the history of the revenue sharing program, tracks trends in specific unrestricted aid categories, and provides a breakdown of unrestricted aid to municipalities within each county from 1988-89 to 2004-05.

Findings include the following:

  • Overall Trends. Unrestricted aid peaked at nearly $1.1 billion in 1988-89, and by 1992-93 it was reduced by approximately 50 percent to a low of $532 million. Since then, aid has grown slowly through some modest across-the-board increases and the creation of some new aid categories. Revenue sharing currently totals $792 million, still 27 percent lower than at its peak.
  • Aid to Cities. More than 90 percent of the total $792 million of revenue sharing funds go to cities. In 2003-04, unrestricted aid made up more than 18 percent of total revenues in cities. Total unrestricted aid to cities outside of New York City currently totals $411 million, an increase of $117 million (+40%) compared to aid received by such cities in 1988-89. New York City now receives $327.9 million in aid, a decrease of 39 percent from 1988-89.
  • Aid to Counties. No unrestricted State aid is provided to counties. An aid program (approximately $15-22 million) was established for counties in 2000-01 to offset the cost of Family Health Plus; however, this aid expired in 2003-04.
  • Aid to Towns. Towns currently receive $37 million in unrestricted aid, a decrease of $108 million (-74%) from 1988-89, which currently accounts for one percent of town revenues.
  • Aid to Villages. $16 million in unrestricted aid is provided to villages, a decrease of $33 million (-68%) compared to 1988-89. Unrestricted aid accounts for one percent of village revenues.
  • Largest Aid Increases. Counties with municipalities that have received the most aid between 1988-89 and 2004-05 include: Westchester (+38%), Onondaga (+33%), Erie (+16%) and Monroe (+5%). These are the counties where the Big Four cities are located.
  • Largest Decreases in Aid. Those counties with the largest declines in aid between 1988-89 and 2004-05 include: Essex (-82%), Greene, Putnam and Sullivan (-79%), Suffolk and Hamilton (-78%), and Lewis and Wayne (-76%).

The report notes that cuts in revenue sharing in the 1990’s were linked to future savings in local government pension contributions, but that the savings never materialized because the proposed funding method was declared unconstitutional. However, the robust market performance, which lowered overall pension contribution rates, masked the aid cuts. While pension costs have returned to more normal historical levels in recent years, revenue sharing funding has not been restored.

Click here for a copy of the research brief or county-by-county data.

 

Albany Phone: (518) 474-4015  Fax:(518) 473-8940
NYC Phone: (212) 681-4825  Fax:(212) 681-4468
Internet: http://www.osc.state.ny.us
E-Mail:press@osc.state.ny.us