Press Releases

CONTACT:
Press Office
(518) 474-4015

 FOR RELEASE:

Immediately
October 6, 2005

 

Audit Finds Good Financial Controls and Oversight at Locust Valley School District

Three Additional LI Schools to Be Audited

Internal financial controls and policies for spending at the Locust Valley school district have been improved and the board of education is providing effective oversight, according to an audit released today by State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi.

This is the 16th Long Island school audit released to date. Audits for another six Long Island school districts are still in progress including Brentwood, East Islip, Manhasset, Three Village, William Floyd and Wyndanch, as well as Nassau County BOCES. Hevesi announced that his office will also be auditing the Center Moriches, Mineola and Patchogue-Medford school districts.

In the Locust Valley audit, auditors reviewed the period of July 1, 2002 to August 31, 2004 and examined administrative expenses. Auditors found that the district had already improved many of its financial practices including hiring a firm to conduct a review of internal controls, improving written policies for cell phones, travel and meals, and securing an outside internal claims auditor.

“I commend the Locust Valley school district and the board of education for making good financial management practices a priority,” Hevesi said. “The district proactively assessed its internal controls and took positive steps to address weaknesses. In the few administrative areas where auditors found room for improvement, the board has acted to implement our recommendations or indicated that it would carefully consider our other recommendations.”

In response to the audit, Anthony L. Singe, superintendent of schools, said “We have believed from the onset that impropriety uncovered in some neighboring districts does not exist in Locust Valley. While the audit report provides this reassurance, we have reviewed, and will incorporate into our procedures, your recommendations to further strengthen our internal controls.” His full response and the board’s action plan is included in the audit, as well as the auditors’ investigation into taxpayer complaints.

Findings include:

  • Credit Card Charges. $16,300 was charged to two credit cards. 58 out of 113 credit charges tested by auditors did not have necessary receipts, but had been paid by the district. The district later provided auditors with additional documentation and explanations for these charges. Prior to the state audit beginning, the district had already canceled its credit cards.
  • Travel Expenses. $42,200 was spent on travel-related expenses. While the board had travel policies requiring that receipts were attached to reimbursement claims, 20 percent of the claims tested by auditors did not contain proper documentation. Additionally, the board had not set limits as to what it would pay for lodging.
  • Cell Phones. $23,900 was spent on cell phone usage. Of the six months of claims tested totaling $4,657, auditors found that the district paid about $2,400 (51 percent) for minutes over the allotted usage plans. Auditors were not able to locate documentation as to why officials were using the phone over their plan allowances, nor did district officials have a standard policy for reviewing bills and seeking reimbursement for calls. Despite not having written policies, auditors noted that the superintendent reimbursed the district for about $688 for personal calls. In December 2004, the district adopted a written cell phone policy.
  • Meals and Refreshments. $67,000 was spent on meals and refreshments at 388 events. The district did not have a policy governing spending on meals during the audit period. However, claims from the school lunch program generally contained information about what meals and refreshments where provided and for what meetings, but other meal expenditures totaling $46,860 paid directly to local vendors were not adequately documented in many cases. In December 2004, the district adopted a meal policy that outlines when it is appropriate to provide meals.
  • Internal Claims Auditor. The internal claims auditor also worked as a part-time typist clerk in the accounting office and reported to the assistant superintendent for business and personnel as well as the board of education, which could jeopardize her independence. The district appointed an accounting firm in September 2004 to solely review claims and report to the board.
  • Internal Controls in the Business Office. Some of the duties of the business administrator/treasurer needed to be better segregated to improve internal controls such as separating who signs the checks and handles cash from who records receipts and prepares bank reconciliations. The district identified ways that it has added additional precautions to better segregate duties in its response.

Auditors recommended that the district:

  • Require that every expense claim contain enough supporting documentation to ensure that expenses are for legitimate school business.
  • Establish a reasonable maximum per diem for lodging
  • Amend its cell phone policy to better address personal use and reimbursements
  • Better segregate the duties currently performed by the business administrator to further improve internal controls.

The Locust Valley school district has approximately 2,280 students, five educational buildings, about 450 employees and an operating budget of about $54 million.

Click here for a copy of the audit.

 

Albany Phone: (518) 474-4015  Fax:(518) 473-8940
NYC Phone: (212) 681-4825  Fax:(212) 681-4468
Internet: http://www.osc.state.ny.us
E-Mail:press@osc.state.ny.us